| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 10:29:58 -0500 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, npiggin@...e.de, clameter@...r.sgi.com, mingo@...e.hu, jschopp@...tin.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mbligh@...igh.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related patches Andrew Morton wrote: > And I'd judge that per-container RSS limits are of considerably more value > than antifrag (in fact per-container RSS might be a superset of antifrag, > in the sense that per-container RSS and containers could be abused to fix > the i-cant-get-any-hugepages problem, dunno). The RSS bits really worry me, since it looks like they could exacerbate the scalability problems that we are already running into on very large memory systems. Linux is *not* happy on 256GB systems. Even on some 32GB systems the swappiness setting *needs* to be tweaked before Linux will even run in a reasonable way. Pageout scanning needs to be more efficient, not less. The RSS bits are worrysome... -- Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group calls the other unpatriotic. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists