linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1172851980.9213.13.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:13:00 -0800
From:	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Amit K. Arora" <aarora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, suparna@...ibm.com,
	cmm@...ibm.com, alex@...sterfs.com, suzuki@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()

On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 09:16 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > 
> > Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > 
> >> This is to give a heads up on few patches that we will be soon coming up
> >> with. These patches implement a new system call sys_fallocate() and a
> >> new inode operation "fallocate", for persistent preallocation. The new
> >> system call, as Andrew suggested, will look like:
> >>
> >>  asmlinkage long sys_fallocate(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t len);
> >>
> > I am wondering about return values from this syscall ? Is it supposed to 
> > return the
> > number of bytes allocated ? What about partial allocations ? 
> 
> If you don't have enough blocks to cover the request, you should 
> probably just return -ENOSPC, not a partial allocation.

That could be challenging, when multiple writers are working in
parallel. You may not be able to return -ENOSPC, till you fail the
allocation (for filesystems which alllocates a block at a time).

> 
> > What about 
> > if the
> > blocks already exists ? What would be return values in those cases ?
> 
> 0 on success, other normal errors oetherwise..
> 
> If asked for a range that includes already-allocated blocks, you just 
> allocate any non-allocated blocks in the range, I think.

Yes. What I was trying to figure out is, if there is a requirement that
interface need to return exact number of bytes it *really* allocated
(like write() or read()). I can't think of any, but just wanted to
through it out..

BTW, what is the interface for finding out what is the size of the
pre-allocated file ? 

Thanks,
Badari

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/