[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070302090753.b06ed267.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 09:07:53 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>,
npiggin@...e.de, clameter@...r.sgi.com, mingo@...e.hu,
jschopp@...tin.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org, mbligh@...igh.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related
patches
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:20:23 -0800 Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > The whole DRAM power story is a bedtime story for gullible children. Don't
> > fall for it. It's not realistic. The hardware support for it DOES NOT
> > EXIST today, and probably won't for several years. And the real fix is
> > elsewhere anyway (ie people will have to do a FBDIMM-2 interface, which
> > is against the whole point of FBDIMM in the first place, but that's what
> > you get when you ignore power in the first version!).
> >
>
> Hardware support for some of this is coming this year in the ATCA space
> on the MPCBL0050. The feature is a bit experimental, and
> power/performance benefits will be workload and configuration
> dependent. Its not a bed time story.
What is the plan for software support?
Will it be possible to just power the DIMMs off? I don't see much point in
some half-power non-destructive mode.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists