linux-kernel - Re: system call time increase when turning on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45E89CFB.4090905@goop.org>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:54:03 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: system call time increase when turning on CONFIG_PARAVIRT

Tim Chen wrote:
> With CONFIG_PARAVIRT turned on, I've found that time invoking
> system_call jumped up quite a lot.  Using TCP streaming test as a
> workload and running on 32-bit 2.6.20 kernel, system_call goes up from
> 0.00025% all the way to 1.6% in the oprofile data.  There is a drop of
> about 4% in overall throughput for this particular workload. 
>
> With lmbench's null system call test, the call time goes up from 0.10
> usec to 0.225 usec.
>
> I'm testing on dual socket Intel core 2 processor running at 2.67 GHz
> with 4 GB RAM.
[ I assume you're talking about running on native hardware. ]

In the current paravirt changes in the kernel, many of the
paravirtualized operations are implemented as (expensive) indirect calls
via paravirt_ops.  Among the changes in the paravirt patches I posted
yesterday is an enhanced patching mechanism which inlines a lot of the
common operations, and converts the rest into direct calls.

I haven't done any detailed measurements on what effect this will have,
but it does bring the actual executed instruction stream much closer to
the !CONFIG_PARAVIRT case, and so I would hope it would recover most or
all of the performance loss you've noticed.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/