[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E77B53.1060309@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 17:18:11 -0800
From: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch 12/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Fix patch site clobbers to include
return register
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Zachary Amsden wrote:
>
>>> Things like what? Do you mean the %[foo] asm parameter syntax? I think
>>> those versions are no longer supported - Arjan posted a patch a few days
>>> ago to convert a pile of asms to this form. Or do you mean something
>>> else?
>>>
>>>
>> I meant having an output in the clobber list,
>>
>
> There's no output in the clobber list, just "memory" and "cc". The
> paravirt_clobber() is the stuff which gets put in the .parainstructions
> section which tells the patcher what registers are expected to be
> modified at that callsite (including both temp and output registers).
>
Ah, ok. I didn't think gcc had grown the appropriate antlers yet to
allow outputs in the clobber list. But the paravirt-clobbers, yes that
makes sense.
Zach
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists