| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 13:58:34 -0800 From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com> To: Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com> Cc: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org Subject: Re: Kernel Oops with shm namespace cleanups On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 16:08 -0800, Bill Irwin wrote: >> Looks like I should grab these testcases for the sake of due diligence >> (not to say I intend to alter maintenance style from primarily review, >> approval, and bugfixing, not that I've been doing as much of any of those >> as I should). To which architectures and/or distributions have the >> userspace bits been ported, or otherwise run/tested on? A quick sniff >> test on an Altix suggests SLES and/or ia64 may trip up the scripts: On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:29:16AM -0600, Adam Litke wrote: > Right now we support x86, powerpc, and x86_64. Segment remapping and > hugetlb malloc won't work on ia64 until long format vhpt is supported (I > suspect). But the test framework should be adaptable to other > architectures. Those patches have been around for a while. I'll ping Tony Luck et al about that since I'm not entirely aware of what their issues might be. I should probably get some testing in on sparc64 at some point, too. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists