linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata: Cable detection fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45E8AA1B.6000803@garzik.org>
Date:	Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:50:03 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
CC:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, torvalds@...l.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: Cable detection fixes

Alan Cox wrote:
>> However, given that we are in -rc cycle, and the wide impact of this 
>> change, this patch wants splitting.  The ->cable_detect stuff should be 
>> in a separate patch from the IDENTIFY DEVICE ordering stuff.  This 
>> ensures sanity when git-bisecting changes, and allows fast-tracking of 
>> the identify-ordering change.
> 
> Fine by me - I carefully sent Linus the hook but no changes using it and
> sent those changes just to the list/you.

The implication was that you should revise, sign-off, and resend, like 
all the other kernel developers do when they receive feedback during 
engineering review...

Nonetheless, I extracted and applied the patch I mention above, and will 
send it upstream today.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/