[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45E8B147.4070104@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 18:20:39 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@...cle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@...r.sgi.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@...net.ie>, npiggin@...e.de, mingo@...e.hu,
jschopp@...tin.ibm.com, arjan@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mbligh@...igh.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: The performance and behaviour of the anti-fragmentation related
patches
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Somehow I don't believe that a person or organisation which is incapable of
> preparing even a simple testcase will be capable of fixing problems such as
> this without breaking things.
I don't believe anybody who relies on one simple test case will
ever be capable of evaluating a patch without breaking things.
Test cases can show problems, but fixing a test case is no
guarantee at all that your VM will behave ok with real world
workloads. Test cases for the VM can *never* be relied on
to show that a problem went away.
I'll do my best, but I can't promise a simple test case
for every single problem that's plaguing the VM.
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world, and those who believe it already is. Each group
calls the other unpatriotic.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists