[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:48:04 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
v4l-dvb maintainer list <v4l-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/9] 2.6.19-stable review
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:48:54PM -0500, Michael Krufky wrote:
>
> The dvbdev patch is pretty important, fixes a horrible problem, although the case for
> it to occur is rare. The other two patches are of the "obviously correct - minimal change"
> type.
>
> If it isnt too much trouble, then yes, it is worth it to push a new release because of the
> dvbdev patch.
>
> However, please chop the "backported from" and "cherry picked from" lines from those patches.
> I cherry-picked them from Mauro's tree, but he wiped it out and re-pushed those changes in
> before Linus merged them.... so, the actual changesets in Linus' tree have different hashes.
>
> (i removed those old hashes from the patches that I posted on linuxtv.org)
I picked up the new patches and did a new release.
> As for the 2.6.20.y patches, should I email those to you inline or can you just grab them from
> the linuxtv.org www server? ( http://linuxtv.org/~mkrufky/stable/2.6.20.y/ )
Email is usually better, as that's what my scripts are set up to handle.
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists