[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:08:24 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Cc: menage@...gle.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, dev@...ru, pj@....com,
sam@...ain.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, serue@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 1/2] rcfs core patch
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:36:49AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> With this don't we end up with a lot of duplicate between cpusets and rcfs.
Unless we remove the duplication in cpusets and make it work with
rcfs/containers!
I wonder if we can avoid so much of filesystem code and use something
like configfs to configure the resource objects. In particular I dont
know if, using configfs, it is possible to provide a multi-hierarchy feature
(each hierarchy bound to separate set of controllers)
> > linux-2.6.20-vatsa/include/linux/init_task.h | 4
> > linux-2.6.20-vatsa/include/linux/nsproxy.h | 5
> > linux-2.6.20-vatsa/init/Kconfig | 22
> > linux-2.6.20-vatsa/init/main.c | 1
> > linux-2.6.20-vatsa/kernel/Makefile | 1
> >
> >
> >---
>
> The diffstat does not look quite right.
Hmm that was generated using refpatch. Will find out what went wrong.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists