[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EAE1B0.2020201@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:11:44 +0100
From: Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dhowells@...hat.com,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [Re: 2.6.21-rc2-mm1] #error no ROMFS backing store interface
configured
Andrew Morton napisaĆ(a):
>
> +config ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
> + bool "Block device-backed ROM file system support"
> + depends on ROMFS_FS && BLOCK
> + help
> + This permits ROMFS to use block devices buffered through the page
> + cache as the medium from which to retrieve data. It does not allow
> + direct mapping of the medium.
> +
> + If unsure, answer Y.
> +
> +config ROMFS_ON_MTD
> + bool "MTD-backed ROM file system support"
> + depends on ROMFS_FS && MTD
> + help
> + This permits ROMFS to use MTD based devices directly, without the
> + intercession of the block layer (which may have been disabled). It
> + also allows direct mapping of MTD devices through romfs files under
> + NOMMU conditions if the underlying device is directly addressable by
> + the CPU.
> +
>
> So we require that one of these be enabled if ROMFS.
>
> There's a way of doing that, but I forget what it is. iirc Adrian has done
> this in the past and can perhaps point us at an example?
>
Yes, I change
# CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK is not set
to
CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y
And error goes away.
Thanks
I dont' have ROMFS_ON_MTD option in config.
--
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (3265 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists