[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070305.013536.115912904.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 01:35:36 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH]: Fix driver bogus delay loop
CT based mach64 cards were reported to hang on sparc64 boxes when
compiled with gcc-4.1.x and later.
Looking at this piece of code, it's no surprise. A critical
delay was implemented as an empty for() loop, and gcc 4.0.x
and previous did not optimize it away, so we did get a delay.
But gcc-4.1.x and later can optimize it away, and we get crashes.
Use a real udelay() to fix this. Fix verified on SunBlade100.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
diff --git a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c b/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c
index f3b487b..1fdcfdb 100644
--- a/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c
+++ b/drivers/video/aty/mach64_ct.c
@@ -598,7 +598,6 @@ static void aty_resume_pll_ct(const struct fb_info *info,
struct atyfb_par *par = info->par;
if (par->mclk_per != par->xclk_per) {
- int i;
/*
* This disables the sclk, crashes the computer as reported:
* aty_st_pll_ct(SPLL_CNTL2, 3, info);
@@ -614,7 +613,7 @@ static void aty_resume_pll_ct(const struct fb_info *info,
* helps for Rage Mobilities that sometimes crash when
* we switch to sclk. (Daniel Mantione, 13-05-2003)
*/
- for (i=0;i<=0x1ffff;i++);
+ udelay(500);
}
aty_st_pll_ct(PLL_REF_DIV, pll->ct.pll_ref_div, par);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists