linux-kernel - Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <14518.1173101815@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 05 Mar 2007 13:36:55 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] fix the ROMFS_* dependencies 

Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:

> OK, what about the patch below?

How many goats did you have to sacrifice to get that to work?  I like it with
just one very minor niggle: if CONFIG_BLOCK=y, CONFIG_MTD=y, CONFIG_ROMFS_FS=y
CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y and CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK=y then the CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_BLOCK
configuration item disappears and reappears depending on the state of
CONFIG_ROMFS_ON_MTD.  But, as I said, it's a very minor niggle.

Acked-By: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/