linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200703051544.24041.caglar@pardus.org.tr>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 15:44:22 +0200
From:	"S.Çağlar Onur" <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@....linux.org.uk>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Chuck Wolber <chuckw@...ntumlinux.com>,
	Chris Wedgwood <reviews@...cw.f00f.org>,
	Michael Krufky <mkrufky@...uxtv.org>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] 2.6.18-stable review

26 Şub 2007 Pts tarihinde, Adrian Bunk şunları yazmıştı: 
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:55:04PM +0200, S.Çağlar Onur wrote:
> > 21 Şub 2007 Çar tarihinde, Greg KH şunları yazmıştı:
> > > Responses should be made by Friday February 23 00:00 UTC.  Anything
> > > received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > We have still some CVEish patches in our package which maybe you want to
> > consider adding into -stable.
>
> Below, I'll only look at the 2.6.18, 2.6.19 and 2.6.20 kernels.
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-4814
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.18.8
> - 2.6.19.2
> - 2.6.20
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5749
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.20 (commit dab6df63086762629936e8b89a5984bae39724f6)
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
> - 2.6.19
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5753
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.20 (commit be6aab0e9fa6d3c6d75aa1e38ac972d8b4ee82b8)
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
> - 2.6.19
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-5823
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.19.2
> - 2.6.20
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6053
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.19.2
> - 2.6.20
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6054
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.19.2
> - 2.6.20
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6333
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.19.1
> - 2.6.20
>
> problem not present in:
> - 2.6.18
>
> > * http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-0006
>
> fixed in:
> - 2.6.19.5
>
> missing in:
> - 2.6.18
> - 2.6.20

So maybe 2.6.18 deserves another stable release :) ?


-- 
S.Çağlar Onur <caglar@...dus.org.tr>
http://cekirdek.pardus.org.tr/~caglar/

Linux is like living in a teepee. No Windows, no Gates and an Apache in house!

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped