[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EC24CA.1020707@qumranet.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:10:18 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [patch] paravirt: VDSO page is essential
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> wrote:
>
>
>> I think we would need to have a paravirt ops callback to decide this
>> first. But it doesn't look critical to me anyways.
>>
>
> well, it's critical to me in two ways: 1) to make the i386 paravirt code
> clean 2) to have a proper VDSO for a KVM paravirtual guest. The original
> change is also bad because it changes how a Linux guest behaves: it
> turns off the vdso by default, and disables the compat VDSO. I.e. it's a
> bad performance step backwards if CONFIG_PARAVIRT is enabled (uses int
> $0x80 instead of sysenter), which hurts only KVM and basically none of
> the other hypervisors. It also muddifies the VDSO picture wrt.
> virtualization.
>
>
kvm paravirt is only used by developers at this time. I don't have a
problem with solving this in the 2.6.22 timeframe.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists