[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173108303.31337.18.camel@imap.mvista.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 07:25:03 -0800
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Emil Karlson <jkarlson@...hut.fi>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 00:13 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 08:57:47 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> >
> > * Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:
> >
> > > Subject : i386: no boot with nmi_watchdog=1 (clockevents)
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/2/21/208
> > > Submitter : Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
> > > Caused-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > commit e9e2cdb412412326c4827fc78ba27f410d837e6e
> > > Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Status : problem is being debugged
> >
> > FYI, this is not a "wont boot" problem, this should be a "NMI watchdog
> > does not work" problem - which has far lower severity. Also, Thomas did
> > a fix for this which is now in -mm.
> >
>
> yup, you should be able to cross this one off, Adrian. The fix worked for me,
> at least.
I didn't see a fix for this one go by .. I'll check the usual places I
guess ..
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists