linux-kernel - Re: module builds need improvement / top Makefile not good enough

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703051707130.24366@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:07:31 +0100 (MET)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
To:	FN <zzzz444@....net>
cc:	Oleg Verych <olecom@...wer.upol.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: module builds need improvement / top Makefile not good enough


On Mar 5 2007 05:53, FN wrote:
>
>| > I am unhappy with the direction the 2.6 kernel builds have taken.
>| > Very much like Micro$loth DDKs we (linux users) are being forced to
>| > build modules by plugging into a framework that doesn't respect the
>fine
>| > aspects of dependency generation and analysis.
>| 
>| Ideas in form of patches are accepted,
>
>I think that one of the bigger firms that support linux, like IBM,
>Redhat,
>Suse, ought to hire a contractor to redesign kbuild and get the linux
>community involved.

The fact that they did not so far means they are fine with Kbuild.


Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/