[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070305174750.GA14507@in.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:17:50 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>, dev@...nvz.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, winget@...gle.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, menage@...gle.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, xemul@...ru,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:22:44PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I still can't claim to have my head around this, but what you write
> here, Herbert, writes here touches on what I suspect is a key
> difference between namespaces and resources that would make it
> impractical to accomplish both with a shared mechanism for aggregating
> tasks.
The way nsproxy is structured, its all pointers to actual namespace (or
in case of rcfs patch) resource objects. This lets namespaces objects be in a
flat hierarchy while resource objects are in tree-like hierarchy.
nsproxy itself doesnt decide any hierarchy. Its those objects pointed to
by nsproxy which can form different hierarchies. In fact the rcfs
patches allows such a combination afaics.
> > on every limit accounting or check? I think that
> > is quite a lot of overhead ...
>
> Do either of these dereferences require locks?
A rcu_read_lock() should be required, which is not that expensive.
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists