[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070305193025.GB26065@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 20:30:25 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Emil Karlson <jkarlson@...hut.fi>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...lanox.co.il>,
Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@....de>
Subject: Re: [5/6] 2.6.21-rc2: known regressions
* Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com> wrote:
> I used this simple test case given by you a long time ago,
>
> main ()
> {
> iopl(3);
> for (;;)
> asm("cli");
>
> }
>
> This doesn't look like a regression tho, 2.6.19-rc6 has the same
> behavior ..
hm, so this doesnt get detected as a lockup at all? That's bad and needs
fixing ...
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists