linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RSDL 5/6] sched: implement rsdl cpu scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070305203857.GQ16722@waste.org>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:38:57 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>
Cc:	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ck list <ck@....kolivas.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RSDL 5/6] sched: implement rsdl cpu scheduler

On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:06:22PM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
> + * This is the time all tasks within the same priority round robin.
> + * Set to a minimum of 6ms.
>   */
> +#define RR_INTERVAL		((6 * HZ / 1001) + 1)

What happens with small HZ? Like 100? I suppose 10ms is a reasonable
number here. But in general, how well does this scheduler do without a
time source other than jiffies?

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/