lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070305223910.GA22630@skybase>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:39:11 +0100
From:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [S390] kprobes breaks BUG_ON

From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>

[S390] kprobes breaks BUG_ON

The illegal operation handler calls the die notifier with DIE_BPT to
let kprobes pick up its breakpoint. If kprobes does not find its
breakpoint it returns NOTIFY_STOP instead of NOTIFY_DONE.
Since we use stop_machine_run on s390 to arm/disarm the kprobes
breakpoints the race that kprobe_handler tries to solve by checking
for the kprobes breakpoints does not exist. Removing the check makes
BUG_ON working again.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
---

 arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c |   21 +++++++--------------
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff -urpN linux-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c linux-2.6-patched/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c
--- linux-2.6/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c	2007-03-05 22:51:29.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6-patched/arch/s390/kernel/kprobes.c	2007-03-05 22:51:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -337,21 +337,14 @@ static int __kprobes kprobe_handler(stru
 	}
 
 	p = get_kprobe(addr);
-	if (!p) {
-		if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {
-			/*
-			 * The breakpoint instruction was removed right
-			 * after we hit it.  Another cpu has removed
-			 * either a probepoint or a debugger breakpoint
-			 * at this address.  In either case, no further
-			 * handling of this interrupt is appropriate.
-			 *
-			 */
-			ret = 1;
-		}
-		/* Not one of ours: let kernel handle it */
+	if (!p)
+		/*
+		 * No kprobe at this address. The fault has not been
+		 * caused by a kprobe breakpoint. The race of breakpoint
+		 * vs. kprobe remove does not exist because on s390 we
+		 * use stop_machine_run to arm/disarm the breakpoints.
+		 */
 		goto no_kprobe;
-	}
 
 	kcb->kprobe_status = KPROBE_HIT_ACTIVE;
 	set_current_kprobe(p, regs, kcb);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ