[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070305.145629.28789919.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 14:56:29 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: schwidefsky@...ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
heiko.carstens@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [S390] Use generic bug.
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 23:43:54 +0100
> + if (__builtin_constant_p(__ret_warn_on)) { \
> + if (__ret_warn_on) \
> + __EMIT_BUG(BUGFLAG_WARNING); \
I see we'll have this construct on powerpc, parisc and now s390.
But if it's going to trigger essentially at compile time, I
think it's much better to BUILD_BUG_ON() in this case instead
of counting on the code path to actually run and the user to
notice and report the kernel log message.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists