[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <382470.25191.qm@web52508.mail.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2007 19:37:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Marc Perkel <mperkel@...oo.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Raid 10 Problems?
--- Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
>
> On Mar 4 2007 19:17, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >Thanks - because of your suggestion I had found the
> >instructions. But you have some interesting options
> >set.
> >
> >-N nicearray -b internal -e 1.0
> >
> >Are these important?
>
> -N? What's in a name? I suppose, it's not so
> important.
> (Arrays are identified by their UUID anyway. But
> maybe
> udev can do something with the name someday as it
> does
> today with /dev/disk/*.)
Not worth starting over for.
>
> -b internal -- seems like a good idea to speed up
> resynchronization.
I'm trying to figure out what the default is.
>
> -e 1.0 -- I wonder why the new superblock format
> is
> not default in mdadm (0.90 is still used).
>
Looks interesting for big arrays but not sure it's
worth starting over for. Trying to get through a 2
hour sync using 4 500gb sata 2 drives.
>
> >pci=nommconf iommu=soft
>
> The nvidia chipset corruption problem?
>
Yep - that's the one.
____________________________________________________________________________________
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists