[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45ED08A9.9050501@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 07:22:33 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] epoll use a single inode ...
Davide Libenzi a écrit :
> On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>> Right now is using:
>>>
>>> this.len = sprintf(name, "[%u.%d]", current->pid, fd);
>>>
>>> That should be unique and not have the wraparound problem. Ack?
>>>
>> NAK, very much NAK.
>>
>> File descriptors aren't file structures, they're *pointers* to file
>> structures.
>>
>> It's perfectly possible -- downright common -- for a file descriptor to be
>> inherited by another process, and then the pid is recycled -- collision.
>
> Ugh! Right! 64 bit counter it is ... :)
For epoll, I suspect this is harmless : Programs dont allocate epolls fd every
milli second, but at startup only.
For pipes/sockets, using a 64 bits would be problematic, because sprintf()
uses a divide for each digit. And a divide is slow. Ten divides are *very* slow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists