[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070306080509.GA2040@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 09:05:09 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libata: add missing PM callbacks
Hi!
> [cc'ing Pavel and linux-kernel, hello]
>
> Original thread can be read from
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ide/16475
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Tejun Heo wrote:
> >> Some LLDs were missing scsi device PM callbacks while having host/port
> >> suspend support. Add missing ones.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
> >
> > applied 1-3, though I agree with Alan that a non-ifdef solution should
> > be sought (by the PM & PCI people?), where possible
>
> Agreed, CONFIG_PM ifdefs are all over low level drivers, libata or not,
> and ugly as hell. Maybe use separate section, mark functions with
> __power and drop them at link time is a better idea. With linker
> tricks, we can make references to __power symbols NULL. How does it sound?
Much complexity for little gain. Who is running _without_ CONFIG_PM
these days?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists