linux-kernel - Re: kref refcounting breakage in mainline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070306002521.GA12164@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Mar 2007 16:25:21 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: kref refcounting breakage in mainline

On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 12:58:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> 
> -mm has a debugging patch which warns when atomic_dec_and_test() takes an
> atomic_t negative
> (ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.20/2.6.20-mm2/broken-out/detect-atomic-counter-underflows.patch).
> 
> 
> When it is applied to current mainline, a simple `rmmod ipw2200' gives:
> 
> [   75.825072] BUG: atomic counter underflow at:
> [   75.825180]  [<c01c6eb4>] kref_put+0x66/0x82
> [   75.825278]  [<c022e4d4>] bus_remove_driver+0x66/0x75
> [   75.825383]  [<c022ee2c>] driver_unregister+0x8/0x13
> [   75.825484]  [<c01d7add>] pci_unregister_driver+0xc/0x45
> [   75.825593]  [<c0132147>] sys_delete_module+0x157/0x17c
> [   75.825703]  [<c013c663>] audit_syscall_entry+0x10d/0x137
> [   75.825818]  [<c0103b14>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [   75.825913]  [<c02d0000>] xfrm4_dst_destroy+0xe/0xd5
> 
> This didn't happen in 2.6.20-mm2, so this bug was introduced by a patch
> which was not in the -mm lineup twelve days ago.
> 
> Presumably the effect of this is a memory leak or a use-after-free.

Ok, after a zillion bisects, I've tracked this down to:
	commit 63ce18cfe685115ff8d341bae4c9204a79043cf0
	Author: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
	Date:   Wed Feb 21 12:45:35 2007 -0800

	    driver core: refcounting fix
	    
	    Fix a reference counting bug exposed by commit
	    725522b5453dd680412f2b6463a988e4fd148757.  If driver.mod_name exists, we
	    take a reference in module_add_driver(), and never release it.  Undo that
	    reference in module_remove_driver().
	    
	    Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
	    Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
	    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
	    Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
	

Mike, I've reverted this patch, and I don't see any references leaking.
And, as your patch released the reference on the driver, and the
module_add_driver() call would not grab a reference to the driver, only
the module kobject, I don't see what you were trying to fix with this
patch.

Do you have a test case that this fixes?

Otherwise, I'll just revert it.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/