linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] libata: add missing PM callbacks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0a09e5c0703060220l18246d19kd1645a16067d1b3d@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 6 Mar 2007 02:20:37 -0800
From:	"Andrew Grover" <andy.grover@...il.com>
To:	"Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	"Tejun Heo" <htejun@...il.com>, "Jeff Garzik" <jeff@...zik.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Alan <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] libata: add missing PM callbacks

On 3/6/07, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > 1. drop !CONFIG_PM configuration
> > 2. continue to sprinkle #ifdef's over device drivers
> > 3. find out prettier way to mark PM functions
>
> ...of 3., and code is nicely generic and fairly simple. I thought it
> would be too much work to implemente it, and it would get too messy.
>
> Given that it is so simple, I believe 3. is the best option. We can
> still do 1. in future if we feel like so...

How much room does it actually save? And, can we maybe have some
actual embedded people saying they need this special treatment?

-- Andy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/