[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070306132613.GA12964@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 14:26:13 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Remove cpu_gdt_table: use boot_gdt_table until migration to per-cpu
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> > + .quad 0x00cf9a000000ffff /* boot: 4GB code at 0x00000000 */
> > + .quad 0x00cf92000000ffff /* boot: 4GB data at 0x00000000 */
> > .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* 0x20 unused */
> > .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* 0x28 unused */
> > .quad 0x0000000000000000 /* 0x33 TLS entry 1 */
>
> actually, the reason for the small boot GDT was that some systems
> wouldnt even boot with a larger GDT. (there was some BIOS interaction,
> forgot what it was - iirc it was mach-visws and also some other older
> box)
>
> the 'simplification' you do here is actually how Linux worked before
> it was fixed for those systems.
>
> so i'd be quite nervous to touch this area of the GDT code. (I'd
> support a renaming though, gdt_table is indeed ugly.)
and this seems to have a ripple effect on the rest of your GDT changes -
i'll wait for this to be cleared before doing a line by line review of
them. I commented on the mostly-unaffected ones already.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists