[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703061538.45049.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:38:44 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@...torb.msk.ru>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hawk@...u.dk,
harry@...os.washington.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Subject: Re: Packet timestamps (was: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20)
On Tuesday 06 March 2007 14:25, Vladimir B. Savkin wrote:
> },
> + {
> + .ctl_name = NET_CORE_ACCURATE_TIMESTAMPS,
> + .procname = "accurate_timestamps",
> + .data = &sysctl_accurate_timestamps,
> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = &proc_dointvec
> + },
> { .ctl_name = 0 }
> };
>
>
> May I ask about integrating this or a similar solution for those
> like me who values routing performance (with bind9 running) over
> minor convinience of having tcpdump always display accurate
> timestamps?
>
Quite frankly I dont like this patch :
1) Fix applications, do not bloat kernel.
2) "accurate_timestamps" is misleading.
Should be "disable_timestamps"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists