[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070305170849.c042e802.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 17:08:49 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Bron Gondwana <brong@...tmail.fm>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yi.zhu@...el.com, jketreno@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: Recent wireless breakage (ipw2200, iwconfig, NetworkManager)
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:56:25 -0500
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> So the question really is are we really done making changes to sysfs,
> or maybe what we should do is talk about major version numbers to
> sysfs.
Perhaps using a config option wasn't the right way to do this - a kernel
boot parameter might be better.
In fact, one could envisage a kernel boot parameter "sysfs_version=N" which
will allow distro people to select the sysfs-of-the-day which works with their
userspace.
Because it does appear that we need _something_ which will get us away from this
ongoing problem of needing to keep the kernel and userspace synchronised across
sysfs changes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists