[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703061008570.12892@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 10:10:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v2] epoll use a single inode ...
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > For epoll, I suspect this is harmless : Programs dont allocate epolls fd
> > every milli second, but at startup only.
> >
> > For pipes/sockets, using a 64 bits would be problematic, because sprintf()
> > uses a divide for each digit. And a divide is slow. Ten divides are *very*
> > slow.
> >
>
> That's true for *any* sprintf(), though. sprintf() converts all its arguments
> to 64 bits.
Sigh! We *always* do do_div(), even for the more trivial %x case.
Anyway, it does not really matter for the type of dfs will be applied to.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists