[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070306181459.GA12037@tentacle.sectorb.msk.ru>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:15:00 +0300
From: "Vladimir B. Savkin" <master@...torb.msk.ru>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, hawk@...u.dk,
harry@...os.washington.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
Subject: Re: Packet timestamps (was: Re: Network performance degradation from 2.6.11.12 to 2.6.16.20)
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 04:16:24PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> It would be better to name the tunable "disable_timestamps", default 0 of
> course....
I agree.
If networking maintainers are interested, I surely can prepare a patch.
But IMO some way to force TSC usage on x86_64 will be even better.
> It would better describe what your patch is actually doing : Even if a tcpdump
> is running (so asking for timestamps), it wont have them because the sysctl
> disabled them.
Well, tcpdump will have timestamps, but taken at wrong moment.
But some other applications (that use ip_queue, ulog etc.) will not,
as I understand.
>
> Thank you
>
~
:wq
With best regards,
Vladimir Savkin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists