[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EDB82F.8030803@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:51:27 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC: torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order() [try #2]
David Howells wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
>> Why not just make it ((n) < 1 ? 0 : ...) and make it well-defined for
>> n == 0?
>
> Because log2(0) is -INF or mathematically undefined or something isn't it?
Yes, but it's a *rounding up* function. In this case, it makes sense to
round up 0 to 1. This is, in fact, a common way to handle requests for
zero-byte allocation in order to be able to return a unique address for
each one, so it's not a spurious thing.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists