lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EDB82F.8030803@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Mar 2007 10:51:27 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
CC:	torvalds@...l.org, akpm@...l.org, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johannes@...solutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix get_order() [try #2]

David Howells wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> 
>> Why not just make it ((n) < 1 ? 0 : ...) and make it well-defined for
>> n == 0?
> 
> Because log2(0) is -INF or mathematically undefined or something isn't it?

Yes, but it's a *rounding up* function.  In this case, it makes sense to 
round up 0 to 1.  This is, in fact, a common way to handle requests for 
zero-byte allocation in order to be able to return a unique address for 
each one, so it's not a spurious thing.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ