[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45EDD96D.1030108@goop.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 13:13:17 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@...el.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: Xen & VMI?
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> so trying to argue as if there was no ABI imposed on Linux by hiding the
> Xen ABI behind paravirt_ops, and whistling into the air as if nothing
> happened is misguided at best.
How is the situation even slightly different with a unified hypervisor ABI?
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists