[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070305191021.eb152377.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 19:10:21 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: i386: make x86_64 tsc header require i386 rather than
vice-versa
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 22:10:33 -0500 Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ian.org> wrote:
> Prior to commit 95492e4646e5de8b43d9a7908d6177fb737b61f0 ([PATCH] x86:
> rewrite SMP TSC sync code), the headers in asm-i386 did not really
> require anything in include/asm-x86_64. This means that distributions
> such as fedora did not include asm-x86_64 in kernel-devel headers for
> i386. Ingo's commit changed that, and broke things. This is easy
> enough to hack around in package builds by just including asm-x86_64 on
> i386, but that's kind of annoying. If anything, x86_64 should depend
> upon i386, not the other way around.
>
> This patch changes it so that asm-x86_64/tsc.h includes asm-i386/tsc.h,
> rather than vice-versa.
Agree - I don't see any gain in making the references be bidirectional, and
it just makes life more complicated. Knowing "x86_64 always references
i386" is a useful mental mark.
That, plus the kernel-headers point which you describe..
<looks at early_printk.c>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists