linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] UML utrace support, step 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070307080159.F27C41801C4@magilla.sf.frob.com>
Date:	Wed,  7 Mar 2007 00:01:59 -0800 (PST)
From:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UML utrace support, step 1

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:19:03PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Your replacement patch still has utrace_regset stuff in it, so it doesn't
> > compile without the later patches in the series.  Try applying only
> > utrace-tracehook.patch from the series, then get it to build and make your
> > utrace-tracehook-um.patch.
> 
> Below is a tracehook patch for UML which goes right after
> utrace-utrace-tracehook.patch.

It does not.  That patch has regset and ptrace stuff in it.  It indeed
applies fine before or after utrace patches.  But it doesn't close to
compile without utrace-regset.patch and utrace-core.patch applied,
and even with utrace-ptrace-compat.patch it still doesn't compile for me
with a lot of complaints about TIF_SINGLESTEP not being defined where
it's used in asm/tracehook.h.


Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/