linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45EE8950.7070103@sw.ru>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 12:43:44 +0300
From:	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To:	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>
CC:	balbir@...ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>, devel@...nvz.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] Resource controllers based on process containers

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
>>Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>>
>>>This patchset adds RSS, accounting and control and
>>>limiting the number of tasks and files within container.
>>>
>>>Based on top of Paul Menage's container subsystem v7
>>>
>>>RSS controller includes per-container RSS accounter,
>>>reclamation and OOM killer. It behaves like standalone
>>>machine - when container runs out of resources it tries
>>>to reclaim some pages and if it doesn't succeed in it
>>>kills some task which mm_struct belongs to container in
>>>question.
>>>
>>>Num tasks and files containers are very simple and
>>>self-descriptive from code.
>>>
>>>As discussed before when a task moves from one container
>>>to another no resources follow it - they keep holding the
>>>container they were allocated in.
>>>
>>
>>I have one problem with the patchset, I cannot compile
>>the patches individually and some of the code is hard
>>to read as it depends on functions from future patches.
>>Patch 2, 3 and 4 fail to compile without patch 5 applied.
>>
>>Patch 1 failed to apply with a reject in kernel/Makefile
>>I applied it on top of 2.6.20 with all of Paul Menage's
>>patches (all 7).
maybe Paul's patch should be taken w/o subsystems examples
(CKRM, UBC), i.e. first 3 patches only?

Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/