[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070307021518.3b1ff4a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 02:15:18 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] fix race in clear_page_dirty_for_io()
(cc's reinstated)
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 09:09:50 +0100 Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> There's a race in clear_page_dirty_for_io() that allows a page to have
> cleared PG_dirty, while being mapped read-write into the page table(s).
I assume you refer to this:
* FIXME! We still have a race here: if somebody
* adds the page back to the page tables in
* between the "page_mkclean()" and the "TestClearPageDirty()",
* we might have it mapped without the dirty bit set.
*/
if (page_mkclean(page))
set_page_dirty(page);
if (TestClearPageDirty(page)) {
dec_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
return 1;
}
I guess the comment actually refers to a writefault after the
set_page_dirty() and before the TestClearPageDirty(). The fault handler
will run set_page_dirty() and will return to userspace to rerun the write.
The page then gets set pte-dirty but this thread of control will now make
the page !PageDirty() and will write it out.
With Nick's proposed lock-the-page-in-pagefaults patches, we have
lock_page() synchronisation between pagefaults and
clear_page_dirty_for_io() which I think will fix this.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists