[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173264462.6374.140.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:47:42 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
benh@...nel.crashing.org
Subject: Re: [patch 4/6] mm: merge populate and nopage into fault (fixes
nonlinear)
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:38 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > There are real users who want these fast, though.
> >
> > Yeah, why don't we have a tree per nonlinear vma to find these pages?
> >
> > wli mentions shadow page tables..
>
> We could do something more efficient, but I thought that half the point
> was that they didn't carry any of this extra memory, and they could be
> really fast to set up at the expense of efficiency elsewhere.
I'm failing to understand this :-(
That extra memory, and apparently they don't want the inefficiency
either.
> I don't see it being a big deal. I doubt anybody is writing out huge
> amounts of data via nonlinear mappings.
Well, now they don't, but it could be done or even exploited as a DoS.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists