[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7689.1173265837@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 11:10:37 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: bryan.wu@...log.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] utrace: nommu fixup support utrace
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com> wrote:
> That old ptrace check seems pretty questionable to me. I think what you
> want is for the nommu world's get_user_pages/access_process_vm when called
> with force=1,write=1 on a read-only MAP_PRIVATE page to do something more
> morally similar to the mmu world's COW than it does now.
Such as what? You *can't* do COW without relocating all the pointers userspace
may have into that VMA. However, unless you force non-sharing of R/O
MAP_PRIVATE VMAs, you will have text segments of executables and libraries
shared with other processes. Imagine: you set a breakpoint in uclibc read()
and your whole system dies instantly.
What I did is to say that if a process has PT_TRACED set then the MAP_PRIVATE
VMAs start with their own copies. The debugger can set this in a new process
by cloning it with appropriate CLONE_xxx flags.
It's not perfect, I know, but it's the best I could come up with as a solution
to debugging things in a NOMMU environment that supports shared libraries and
executables.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists