linux-kernel - How do I analyze a soft lockup?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87k5xt40ew.fsf@ABG3595C.abg.fsc.net>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:02:15 +0100
From:	Rainer Koenig <Rainer.Koenig@...itsu-siemens.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: How do I analyze a soft lockup? 

Hi there,

Environment:

Kernel is 2.6.16.27, arch x86_64 on a Dual Core AMD64 machine with
4 GB of RAM. Also involved is an Areca 1100 SATA RAID controller
with the drives from the Tekram website. 

Problem: 

We get customer reports that a system stops with the following kernel
messages (as they are submitted to us, we're not able yet to reproduce
the problem in our laboratory :-( )

------------------8<-snip--------------------------------------------

BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!

Call Trace:
  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8024cd64>] softlockup_tick+0xd3/0xe5
  [<ffffffff8023700d>] update_process_times+0x42/0x68
  [<ffffffff80215925>] smp_local_timer_interrupt+0x31/0x54
  [<ffffffff80215997>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0x66
  [<ffffffff8020a266>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8025d643>] __handle_mm_fault+0x256/0x2d9
  [<ffffffff8025d640>] __handle_mm_fault+0x253/0x2d9
  [<ffffffff8021d5c2>] do_page_fault+0x23f/0x572
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff805c27dd>] error_exit+0x0/0x84
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff80373550>] __put_user_4+0x20/0x30
  [<ffffffff802272cb>] schedule_tail+0x81/0x86
  [<ffffffff8020958c>] ret_from_fork+0xc/0x25

BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#1!

Call Trace:
  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff8024cd64>] softlockup_tick+0xd3/0xe5
  [<ffffffff8023700d>] update_process_times+0x42/0x68
  [<ffffffff80215925>] smp_local_timer_interrupt+0x31/0x54
  [<ffffffff80215997>] smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x4f/0x66
  [<ffffffff8020a266>] apic_timer_interrupt+0x66/0x70
  <EOI>  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8025d643>] __handle_mm_fault+0x256/0x2d9
  [<ffffffff8025d640>] __handle_mm_fault+0x253/0x2d9
  [<ffffffff8021d5c2>] do_page_fault+0x23f/0x572
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff8021d8f2>] do_page_fault+0x56f/0x572
  [<ffffffff805c27dd>] error_exit+0x0/0x84
  [<ffffffff8020969e>] system_call+0x7e/0x83
  [<ffffffff80373550>] __put_user_4+0x20/0x30
  [<ffffffff802272cb>] schedule_tail+0x81/0x86
  [<ffffffff8020958c>] ret_from_fork+0xc/0x25

----------------8<-snip------------------------------------------

The first thing that makes me very suspicious or curious is that the
call stack shows "__handle_mm_fault" twice, but looking at the source
of that function I don't see any recursion that would explain the 
double line. 

Is there any idea where I can start digging around? 

TIA
Rainer
-- 
Rainer König, Diplom-Infomatiker (FH), Augsubrg, Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/