[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703071019.55896.rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:19:55 -0500
From: Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org>
To: "Krzysztof Halasa" <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>, rmk@....linux.org.uk,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: should RTS init in serial core be tied to CRTSCTS
On Wed 7 Mar 2007 07:46, Krzysztof Halasa pondered:
> Robin Getz <rgetz@...ckfin.uclinux.org> writes:
> > It is useful on (broken) legacy serial equipment, where RTS should be
> > completely under the applications control.
> >
> > Glitches on RTS aren't acceptable, and confuse some devices.
>
> Does that mean you can't use TIOCMSET, TIOCM_RTS etc?
>
> > I understand - the request wasn't to change the default operation -
>
> just
>
> > add a
> > method of controlling things, so those minority of people who want the
> >
> > control can have it.
>
> No problem as long as open without CRTSCTS raises RTS by default.
Right - so the question is where to manage the default state? I was thinking
in the resource might be a good idea, but there isn't really a good place for
it. (You could re-use some bits if flags, but I think that would not be a
good idea).
-Robin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists