[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200703071556.49547.ak@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 15:56:49 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [patch] disable NMI watchdog by default
On Wednesday 07 March 2007 04:06, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > --- linux.orig/include/asm-x86_64/nmi.h
> > +++ linux/include/asm-x86_64/nmi.h
> > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ extern int setup_nmi_watchdog(char *);
> >
> > extern atomic_t nmi_active;
> > extern unsigned int nmi_watchdog;
> > -#define NMI_DEFAULT -1
> > +#define NMI_DEFAULT 0
>
> Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but this patch doesn't seem
> correct to me. The sentiment of disabling the NMI watchdog by default
> is fine, and I agree with it, but I don't think this patch does what
> it says. First of all, I have a system running a kernel with this
> patch applied (v2.6.21-rc2-gc3442e2), and I see NMIs in
> /proc/interrupts and "testing NMI watchdog ... OK." in the log.
Yes the patch looks quite broken.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists