[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d120d5000703070756v4fe11a54u9009d3efd93faa9d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:56:22 -0500
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com>,
"Oliver Neukum" <oliver@...kum.name>,
"Maneesh Soni" <maneesh@...ibm.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...sta.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc suspend regression: sysfs deadlock
On 3/6/07, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> - removing the buffer is now just
>
> mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> buffer = inode->i_private;
> inode->i_private = NULL;
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>
> put_sysfs_buffer(buffer);
>
> - everybody is happy!
>
... with the exception that it will again make data associated with
sysfs attributes accessible past the point of returning from
sysfs_remove_file. And that was the point so drivers would not have to
care about handling access to extra data (such as static strings) past
the driver unload.
I wonder if we should keep Oliver's change and require attribute
implementations to offload "delete me" kind of actions to workqueues.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists