linux-kernel - Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/7] containers (V7): Cpusets hooked into containers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2007 08:31:26 -0800
From:	"Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
To:	vatsa@...ibm.com
Cc:	sekharan@...ibm.com, ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xemul@...ru, dev@...ru,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, pj@....com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, winget@...gle.com, rohitseth@...gle.com,
	serue@...ibm.com, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 2/7] containers (V7): Cpusets hooked into containers

On 3/7/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com> wrote:
> It makes sense in the first cpuset patch
> (cpusets_using_containers.patch), but should be removed in the second
> cpuset patch (multiuser_container.patch). In the 2nd patch, we use this
> comparison:
>
>         if (task_cs(p) != cs)
>                 continue;
>
> cont variable introduced in the 1st patch essentially becomes unused
> after 2nd patch.
>

Yes, you're right - it could be removed in the 3rd patch.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/