[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070307173226.GD2336@in.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:02:26 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, sam@...ain.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
pj@....com, dev@...ru, xemul@...ru, serue@...ibm.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, winget@...gle.com,
ckrm-tech@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] resource control file system - aka containers on top of nsproxy!
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 11:00:31PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> So we got several choices here.
>
> 1. Introduce the container abstraction as is in your patches
> 2. Extend nsproxy somehow to represent hierarchies
> 3. Let individual resource controllers that -actually- support
> hierarchical resource management maintain hierarchy in their code.
3 is what I am following for the cpuset conversion (currently under
test).
--
Regards,
vatsa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists