linux-kernel - Re: [patch 2/6 -rt] powerpc 2.6.20-rt8: to convert spinlocks to raw ones.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45EEF6A4.9090807@ru.mvista.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:30:12 +0300
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...mvista.com>
To:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc:	Tsutomu OWA <tsutomu.owa@...hiba.co.jp>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/6 -rt] powerpc 2.6.20-rt8: to convert spinlocks to raw
 ones.

Hello.

Paul Mackerras wrote:

>>    I've already sent a patch fixing this one (along with many others) a month 
>>ago:

>>http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2007-February/031164.html

>>    I wonder iof it was ever considered... :-/

> The entire patch description was just this:

>>Convert the spinlocks in the PowerPC interrupt related code into the raw ones,
>>also convert the PURR and PMC related spinlocks...

> which says what you did, but gives NO CLUE about why this might be a
> good thing to do - what problem it fixes or what desirable outcome it
> produces.  I will not apply patches with inadequate descriptions.

    As I said, this was intended for the -rt patch, hence the question was for 
Ingo. I CC'ed the list just to keep people here in a loop.

> Paul.

WBR, Sergei
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/