linux-kernel - Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <45EF2FFE.7010705@vmware.com>
Date:	Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:34:54 -0800
From:	Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
CC:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
	Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree

On 03/07/2007 01:40 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:07 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> That would certainly be ideal.  We'll look at the xen, vmi, lguest and
>> kvm paravirtualized time models and see how much they really have in
>> common.  I'm a bit curious about how vmi's time events make their way
>> back into the system.
> 
> By the crude mechanism I'm fighting.
>

Hmm?  They make there way back via interrupts.  How is that crude?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/