[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1173305670.24738.849.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 23:14:30 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
Virtualization Mailing List <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:34 -0800, Dan Hecht wrote:
> On 03/07/2007 01:40 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:07 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > That would certainly be ideal. We'll look at the xen, vmi, lguest and
> >> kvm paravirtualized time models and see how much they really have in
> >> common. I'm a bit curious about how vmi's time events make their way
> >> back into the system.
> >
> > By the crude mechanism I'm fighting.
> >
>
> Hmm? They make there way back via interrupts. How is that crude?
Simply because you _ABUSE_ timer_init_hook() to set it up. Keep it self
contained and do not impose restrictions on the kernel core code, which
we have to maintain.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists