[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070307221746.GA3620@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 23:17:46 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Steven French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-cifs-client@...ts.samba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: remove useless cargo-cult checks
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:51:04PM -0600, Steven French wrote:
> > file->f_path.dentry or file->f_path.dentry.d_inode can't be NULL
>
> OK - I don't really mind removing these checks - and I agree that I there
> is not an obvious way that they can be null, yet we had a case in which
> file->f_dentry was reported as NULL a few years back in a bug report that
> we could not reproduce.
There's a good reason you couldn't reproduce it, because it most likely
must have been a really bad hack in the submitters kernel. Setting
up file->f_dentry is one of the first thing we do after allocating the
file struct.
>
> The change to f_path.dentry did hit all filesystems (not sure who did it
> last year) and that patch did hit lkml - so this is not something new that
> just slipped in.
I know - that patch just made the enormous amount of useless checks
vissible.
> Is there an easy way to mirror particular patches going into the
> cifs-2.6.git tree (which is pulled into mm) to lkml?
Maybe some git expert can comment on that.
> The cifs patches go in mm for at least a week before they go into kernel
> but some of them I would like to post again to lkml.
polling -mm is a little hard as it's an enormous blob, so posting to
lkml or -fsdevel would definitively be quite helpfull.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists